Sunday, 26 August 2012

Dengue fever - the Brazilian experience

Now and again through the evening calm comes the sound of a powerful petrol motor, and soon afterwards the streets are filled with a thick, grey, pungent cloud. This is insecticide, and they are fumigating against Aedes mosquitoes, principally Aedes aegypti but also increasingly Aedes albopictus. Aedes are one of the banes of mankind, in many ways, but the worry here is Dengue fever.

Dengue, or "breakbone" fever causes fever (clearly), muscle pains and, in a small % of cases, internal hemorrhaging and death. Brazil has by far the highest numbers of Dengue cases in the world, 936,000 confirmed cases in 2010 out of 1,785,059 worldwide (52%) and 592 deaths out of 2,398. This year Rio de Janeiro alone had 31,176 registered cases up to April 7th, and 6 deaths.

There is as yet no vaccine against Dengue, although progress is being made. Just this year the results came in of a four year Brazilian study in which 180 volunteers were vaccinated, and 95% produced sufficient antibodies for immunity. This study has been increased to 800 people, and eventually there will be a full scale clinical trial of 20,000 people throughout Latin America.

You can´t catch Dengue by shaking hands, or sneezing or eating the wrong food, it has to be transmitted blood to blood, which in practice means the bite of a female mosquito. Dengue prevention measures mean mosquito prevention measures. Public health varies from city to city, but as an example, this is the situation in Vitoria (Pop. 330,500) in the state of Espirito Santo.

i) Mosquitoes can breed in any little pot of dirty water. Shops and businesses are regularly monitored to ensure there are no possible breeding sites, especially trucking and type recycling companies as tyres are notorious breeding grounds for Aedes aegypti. Failure of an inspection can result in a R$2000 fine and persistent offenders can be closed down. Vitoria has 250 inspectors for Dengue and other diseases. This is backed up by a regular television campaign aimed at households.

ii) Mosquito numbers are monitored using 35 traps around the city which both collect adults and have a space for eggs to be laid.

iii) The above mentioned insecticide "foggers" operate 120 hours per month. Additionally 22,800 manholes and culverts are treated with larvicide each week.

iv) Staff education courses and workshops.

This sounds impressive, but there are problems. The most important is probably the issue of breeding sites. Urban areas are dotted with building sites and waste ground and Aedes aegypti only needs a rain filled puddle. It doesn´t even have to be clean puddle, they can tolerate oily, polluted or even slightly brackish water. A survey of workers at a rubbish tip in Rio found 23% had had Dengue. And in Brazilian temperatures mosquitoes develop very quickly, the time from egg to adult is only 10 days at 30 C. Cases of Dengue peak from December to May, the months of hottest temperatures.

The situation in the countryside is different, as Aedes aegypti tends to be a city mosquito, and larvae are snapped up by fish in lakes and ponds. But there are still plenty of holes and puddles, and the bromeliads common to the Mata Atlantica region provide perfect, safe, breeding sites. Also, various native mammals seem to be host to the Dengue virus, though not as many as in other continents as Dengue is not native to South America. Nonetheless, scientists in neighbouring French Guyana have found the virus in rodents, opossums and bats, which suggests that it is adapting. It has also been found in the forest mosquito, Haemagogus leucocelaenus. In other words, you could completely sterilise a city of mosquitoes, and the Dengue virus would still survive in the countryside, ready to return.

The only long term hope is a vaccine.


ZELLULA Life Sciences said...

Very nice article. Do houses/offices in Vitoria have insect screen in doors and windows?

Dengue mosquitoes are know to be active during day, which indicate that mosquitoe nets might not be effective. Any thoughts on this?

Anonymous said...

I´ve loved the posters! It seems you must be collecting these for while!...

David said...

Thank you both, I have tried to capture some of the posters I've seen around.
Regarding nets and screens, they are not as common as you might think, in fact quite rare. Plug-in-the-wall repellents are widely available in supermarkets, or insecticide sprays, but not nets.


By using this blog, you signify your agreement to this disclaimer. Do not use this website if you do not agree to this disclaimer.

This blog is published by Sarah Stephen and Ruth Stephen, and reflects the personal views of the contributors, in their individual capacities as a concerned citizen of this planet. The term 'Ecoratorio', as well as every graphic, opinion, comment, and statement expressed in this blog are the exclusive property of the blog publishers and contributors (© 2009 - present), unless explicitly stated otherwise, and should not be disseminated without the written consent of the author(s). The views expressed in this blog are not necessarily representative of the views of any school, college, University, company, organisation, city, town, state, country, or church where the author(s) have studied, worked, worshipped, or lived, and is not sponsored or endorsed by them.

This blog and its contents does not receive any sponsorship, financial or otherwise, neither is it aimed at generating any money.

The matter on this blog has been prepared for informational purposes only, and the reader(s) should not solely rely upon this information for any purpose nor should he/she assume that this information applies to his/her specific situation. Furthermore, the matter on this blog may or may not reflect the current and future trends/developments, may or may not be general or specific, accordingly, information on this blog is not promised, or guaranteed, to be correct or complete. The publishers and author(s) explicitly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken, or not taken, based on any, or all, the contents of this blog. Thus, the reader(s) is/are reading the posts and arriving at conclusions about the information, or about the author(s), or otherwise, at his/her own risk.

This blog may contain weblinks, which are provided solely for the reader(s) convenience. Such weblinks to another blog or website does not imply any relationship, affiliation, endorsement, responsibility, or approval of the linked resources or their contents (over which we have no control). Accessing these links will be at the reader(s)’s own risk.

The publishers and author(s) are not responsible for translation and interpretation of content. Occasionally, the blog might contain subjects which may be considered offensive from certain individuals’ points-of-view, and the author(s) refuses to accept any liability for any psychological, physical, and emotional reactions, short-term or long-term, which the posts might generate in the reader(s). However, each post in this blog is the individual opinion of the author(s) and is not intended to malign any city/town/village, state, country, continent, faith, religion, practice, ethnic group, club, organisation, company, or individual. Neither are the publishers and author(s) responsible for any statements bound to government, religious, or other laws from the reader(s)’s country of origin.

The publishers and author(s) reserves the right to update, edit, delete or otherwise remove, the posts or any comments, the latter of which might be deemed offensive or spam. The publishers and author(s) cannot warrant that the use of this blog will be uninterrupted or error-free, or that defects on this site will be corrected. The publishers and author(s) also reserves the right to publish in print media, in whole or part, any of the posts which might be an edited version. If the reader(s) has a problem with any post, the publishers and author(s) expects them to contact them, explaining the reasons for their discomfort. However, if the reader(s) choose to communicate with the publishers and author(s) by email, the reader(s) must note that since the security of unencrypted email is uncertain, sending sensitive or confidential emails holds the risks of such uncertainty and possible lack of confidentiality.

The publishers and author(s) reserve the right to change this Disclaimer, from time to time, in their sole and absolute discretion. If the reader(s) using this website after the institution of such changes, he/she is signifying their agreement to these changes. The publishers and author(s) also reserve the right to discontinue any aspect of this website at any time.