Tuesday, 8 May 2012

A small step for koalas

I have been following certain developments on the koala front in Australia. The marsupial is an icon associated with Australia- and is also well known for its predilection for eucalyptus and sleep.


After a decline in the wild population (to approx. around 200,000 according to government figures), Tony Burke (Australia’s Environment Minister), following a Senate report, has listed koalas as ‘vulnerable’ species last week. However, the tag will be restricted to certain areas- i.e Queensland, New South Wales (both states experienced a heavy decline in population), and Australian Capital Territory (which now has no wild koalas), which is another example of effective lobbying by the industries concerned as both Victoria (which has the distinct Strzelecki koalas, most of which are in private properties) and South Australia are not included (Burke claims that there are large koala populations in these two states). Whilst NSW welcomed this development, the Queensland Premier, Campbell Newman, is disgruntled, labelling the move as a ‘mindless green tape’ and threat to the employment market and development in the state.

The Senate report associated the population decline with habitat destruction (mainly by coal mining, logging, and housing developments), climate change (drought and extreme weather resulting in bushfires), accidents (road-kill), attacks by dogs (especially in summer when they venture into gardens to drink from swimming pools and water bowls), and disease (notably: Chlamydia). In the case of bushfires, koalas’ slow-moving nature prevents them from escaping from fires.

The question now remains as to what will be done proactively to ensure that the koala isn’t driven to extinction.


Image source: BSPI/Corbis
Sources:


http://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/koalas-to-be-listed-as-threatened-amid-rapid-decline-20120426-1xo22.html

http://www.smh.com.au/environment/animals/youd-be-lucky-to-see-one-bid-to-protect-the-koala-20120430-1xv64.html#ixzz1tXMalDBm

http://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/koalas-get-some-protections-from-developers-20120430-1xtps.html#ixzz1tXMresPs

http://www.businessreviewaustralia.com/business_leaders/mining-boom-contributing-to-koala-decline

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/04/30/australian-govt-to-protect-koala-bears/#ixzz1tXLgGhYn

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/koala-listing-another-example-of-government-greentape-says-campbell-newman/story-fn59niix-1226342948508

http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/pubs/guidelines-species.pdf

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/environment/koalas-protected-in-north-but-need-managing-in-south-20120430-1xu13.html#ixzz1tXM4mhNF

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/qld-slams-koala-move-as-mindless-green-tape-20120430-1xvfm.html#ixzz1tXN8svj7

http://www.abc.net.au/local/photos/2012/04/30/3491805.htm

http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2012/04/30/3492033.htm

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-04-30/koala-listed-as-vulnerable/3980216/?site=sydney
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-04-30/no-protection-for-victoria27s-koalas/3981160?section=vic

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/victorian-koalas-left-out-in-the-cold-20120430-1xv2b.html#ixzz1tXMRlXGf

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8459541/nsw-govt-welcomes-koala-listing


2 comments:

David said...

It is tempting to suggest introducing them to Brazil where there are large Eucalyptus plantations for the paper industry, but artifical introductions don't have a very good track record! I hope the Australians can protect better such an iconic animal

Sarah Stephen said...

Indeed! Also, the deforestation reports of Brazil is quite disheartening. Perhaps what they need is a wildlife reserve- just for them.

Disclaimer

By using this blog, you signify your agreement to this disclaimer. Do not use this website if you do not agree to this disclaimer.

This blog is published by Sarah Stephen and Ruth Stephen, and reflects the personal views of the contributors, in their individual capacities as a concerned citizen of this planet. The term 'Ecoratorio', as well as every graphic, opinion, comment, and statement expressed in this blog are the exclusive property of the blog publishers and contributors (© 2009 - present), unless explicitly stated otherwise, and should not be disseminated without the written consent of the author(s). The views expressed in this blog are not necessarily representative of the views of any school, college, University, company, organisation, city, town, state, country, or church where the author(s) have studied, worked, worshipped, or lived, and is not sponsored or endorsed by them.

This blog and its contents does not receive any sponsorship, financial or otherwise, neither is it aimed at generating any money.

The matter on this blog has been prepared for informational purposes only, and the reader(s) should not solely rely upon this information for any purpose nor should he/she assume that this information applies to his/her specific situation. Furthermore, the matter on this blog may or may not reflect the current and future trends/developments, may or may not be general or specific, accordingly, information on this blog is not promised, or guaranteed, to be correct or complete. The publishers and author(s) explicitly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken, or not taken, based on any, or all, the contents of this blog. Thus, the reader(s) is/are reading the posts and arriving at conclusions about the information, or about the author(s), or otherwise, at his/her own risk.

This blog may contain weblinks, which are provided solely for the reader(s) convenience. Such weblinks to another blog or website does not imply any relationship, affiliation, endorsement, responsibility, or approval of the linked resources or their contents (over which we have no control). Accessing these links will be at the reader(s)’s own risk.

The publishers and author(s) are not responsible for translation and interpretation of content. Occasionally, the blog might contain subjects which may be considered offensive from certain individuals’ points-of-view, and the author(s) refuses to accept any liability for any psychological, physical, and emotional reactions, short-term or long-term, which the posts might generate in the reader(s). However, each post in this blog is the individual opinion of the author(s) and is not intended to malign any city/town/village, state, country, continent, faith, religion, practice, ethnic group, club, organisation, company, or individual. Neither are the publishers and author(s) responsible for any statements bound to government, religious, or other laws from the reader(s)’s country of origin.

The publishers and author(s) reserves the right to update, edit, delete or otherwise remove, the posts or any comments, the latter of which might be deemed offensive or spam. The publishers and author(s) cannot warrant that the use of this blog will be uninterrupted or error-free, or that defects on this site will be corrected. The publishers and author(s) also reserves the right to publish in print media, in whole or part, any of the posts which might be an edited version. If the reader(s) has a problem with any post, the publishers and author(s) expects them to contact them, explaining the reasons for their discomfort. However, if the reader(s) choose to communicate with the publishers and author(s) by email, the reader(s) must note that since the security of unencrypted email is uncertain, sending sensitive or confidential emails holds the risks of such uncertainty and possible lack of confidentiality.

The publishers and author(s) reserve the right to change this Disclaimer, from time to time, in their sole and absolute discretion. If the reader(s) using this website after the institution of such changes, he/she is signifying their agreement to these changes. The publishers and author(s) also reserve the right to discontinue any aspect of this website at any time.

Thankyou.