Vehicular emissions and tobacco smoke are harming the lungs of young children in our cities |
When it comes to the evidence against tobacco and vehicular emissions
on harming human respiratory health, it does not rain but it pours. And it keeps on coming. We have extensive evidence to show that
vehicular emissions as well as tobacco smoke exposure are bad for health and it
seems to start right from the fetal stage. A new study presented in the journal Environmental Health shows that exposure to traffic-related air pollutants is
associated with increased risks of wheezing in children who are exposed to
tobacco smoke in fetal life and infancy
indicating an axis of villains who co-operate to exert their harmful effects.
The study was a large prospective cohort study involving 4,634
children in Rotterdam, the second largest city in the Netherlands. One of the largest ports in the world, it is also
one of the most polluted places in the Netherlands and an apt location for
pollution studies. A prospective cohort study is one that monitors a group of
similar individuals –cohorts- who differ in certain factors under study over a
time period in order to understand how these factors affect rates of a certain
outcome- in this study, how effects of vehicular emissions, tobacco smoke
exposure (in any stage starting from fetal life to the age of 3 years) affect
wheezing in children.
Many cities, like this one, has air pollution monitors that helps scientist understand how air pollutants affect human health . |
Results from the study indicated that average annual PM10 or NO2 exposure
levels per year were not associated with wheezing in the same year. Even though there were trends showing a link
with PM10 or NO2 exposure levels and wheezing during the first 3 years of life,
the results were not statistically significant. The researchers did not observe
associations of traffic-related air pollutants with wheezing among children who
were exposed to smoke during fetal life only or during infancy only. But in children
who were exposed to tobacco smoke in both fetal and infant stage, PM10 or NO2
exposure levels was associated with wheezing during the first 3 years of life. The
scientists did not observe associations of traffic-related air pollutants with
wheezing among children who were not exposed to tobacco smoke.
There are limitations in the study, one of which the researchers have noted viz. the
possibility of ‘misclassification of air pollution assessment’ owing to the analysis
only involving exposure levels at home addresses and not at
the day care centers or other places where the child may spend days and nights.
One factor that could have further added value to the study is blatantly
missing- work addresses of mothers and PM 10, NO2 levels - and whether when analysed together with
air pollution exposure at home had any links to wheezing in children.
Nevertheless the study extends our understanding on how air
pollution and tobacco smoke exposure contribute to the health of younger
children. The results suggest that long
term exposure to traffic-related air pollutants is associated with increased
risks of wheezing in children exposed to tobacco smoke in fetal life and
infancy. Tobacco smoke exposure in early
life might lead to increased vulnerability of the lungs to air pollution. The
evidence appears to show that exposure of
fetus and infant lung to tobacco smoke
primes it for damage by air pollutants leading to wheezing suggesting that the
dangerous cocktail is made more potent by the ingredients together.
References
No comments:
Post a Comment